Tuesday, April 2, 2013
AP LIT Book talk
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
More sources for Fat City Essay
AP Lang Fat City Essay
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
AP Language rhetorical terms
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Where to go to make your own blog!
Visit here to begin the blog making process.
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Another Source for CHA drug testing
BY MAUDLYNE IHEJIRIKA
Staff Reporter/mihejirika@suntimes.com
Last Modified: Jul 3, 2011 01:39PM
The Chicago Housing Authority wants to require all adults who currently live in, or apply in the future for housing in any of its developments, to be tested for drugs — including senior citizens.
The blanket policy proposal for anyone 18 years or older has residents and housing advocates crying foul.
The American Civil Liberties Union charges the public agency seeks to place a double standard on the poor.
“It’s such an insensitive proposal to even bring to the table,” said Myra King, a resident of the Far South Side Lowden Homes development. She chairs the Central Advisory Council of tenant leaders from CHA properties all across the city.
“Singling us out for this type of humiliation is a slap in the face of what this whole ‘Plan for Transformation’ supposedly is about,” King said. “CHA says they’re doing this plan to make us privvy to the same standards as any other citizen in any other community. If that’s true, why are we the only citizens to be drug tested?”
The measure is among several changes to the lease and CHA’s Admissions and Continued Occupancy Policy proposed by CEO Lewis Jordan. Under the policy, a positive drug test would subject leaseholders to eviction proceedings.
Agency officials argue they need more tools to fight crime, particularly the drug scourge, in CHA developments.
Also controversial is a proposed elimination of the so-called “innocent tenant defense,” referring to evictions initiated when a drug-related or violent crime has been committed by a relative or guest of the leaseholding tenant — but the tenant was not involved nor had knowledge of the crime. In 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled housing authorities may evict under such “innocent tenant” circumstances, so CHA would be within its rights. But former CHA chief Terry Peterson had negotiated an agreement with tenants that had continued to allow the defense if it could be proved in court.
Jordan, who took over the agency in 2008, declined to be interviewed on the proposals.
Spokeswoman Kellie O’Connell-Miller pointed out several CHA mixed-income properties currently require drug testing.
“These are policies to help strengthen and improve the safety of our public housing communities,” O’Connell-Miller said.
“We’re constantly hearing from law-abiding residents that they want us to hold the non-law abiding residents more accountable. We’re trying to tighten up our lease with some of these issues. Drug dealers won’t come where there are no buyers. If you remove the folks who are interested in drugs, hopefully it will remove some of the problems,” she said.
The policy would apply to 16,000 families living in family and senior public housing. The agency has not yet explored the cost associated with the proposal, O’Connell-Miller said.
A spokeswoman for the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development here said as federal policy prohibits drug users from public housing property, authorities nationwide are free to enforce that rule as they see fit. HUD does not track such enforcement, so it could not say if any other housing authorities had such a blanket policy, nor could CHA.
“The ACLU opposes drug testing in the absence of suspicion as a condition of residency in public housing,” said senior lawyer Adam Schwartz.
“From our perspective, drug testing without suspicion is humiliating. It’s stigmatizing. There’s a double standard here,” he said. “All across our city and our country, when most of us who are in whatever income bracket rent housing, we don’t have to take a drug test. This is an emerging one standard for poor people and another standard for everyone else.”
However, a 1999 ACLU case filed against the state of Michigan may not bode well for such a proposal, Schwartz noted.
In Marchwinski vs Howard, the head of that state’s Department of Public Aid mandated blanket drug testing for a sub-population of public aid recipients. The ACLU won an injunction that was later upheld by an appellate court.
The proposed changes, unveiled May 17, are open to public comment through June 16. A public hearing on the changes is scheduled to be held at 6 p.m. June 2nd, at the Charles A. Hayes Center, 4455 S. King Drive. If adopted, the proposal then has to go before the CHA Board and chairman Jim Reynolds for approval, then HUD.
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Junior English Project
Requirements: • A minimum of three pages typed using MLA format for in text citations.
• Works Cited Page following MLA standards
• A clear intro, discrete body paragraphs which center on one topic each, and conclusion
• Uses transition words to create an orderly flow
• A counterargument
• Grammatically sound
• Take a position on the issue and use evidence to support that opinion
The leadership at the Chicago Housing Authority has suggested mandatory drug testing for all residents over 18. A positive test result would result in mandatory drug counseling and evictions. Read the sources and then synthesize at least 3 sources to evaluate the consequences of drug testing CHA residents.
Or
Not Interested? Think about an issue that does interest you and develop a research question of your own and synthesize at least 3 sources to answer the question. Your research question must be approved by your teacher and you must follow the validity guidelines for gathering sources. Extra Credit will be given for students who use the CPS database to gather their sources.
CHA drug tests?
June 03, 2011—accessed from the Chicago Tribune website November 28, 2011
This is an editorial, authored by the editorial board of the paper
The Chicago Housing Authority is in the midst of a transformation that has rescued its residents from high-rise hells and allowed them to live with more safety and dignity in mixed-income, low-rise apartments. The demolition of Cabrini-Green, once the symbol of everything wrong with public housing, has just been completed.
The CHA has a new and controversial proposal that is intended to promote the safety and dignity of its residents: mandatory drug tests for all adults who apply for a CHA lease or renew a lease. If a tenant tests positive for drugs, he or she will be steered into city-funded drug treatment. If a tenant refuses treatment, he or she can be evicted.
This gives us pause, because broad drug testing that's not triggered by evidence of abuse does infringe on privacy. Chicago would be the first city to require drug testing for all public housing residents. The CHA currently tests residents in nearly half of the 45 mixed-income developments that blend public housing residents with people who pay market rates to buy or rent.
The proposal has gotten mixed reviews from public housing residents. Minnie Jefferson, who lives in a CHA senior building, is all for getting drugs out of her neighborhood. She had to kick out two younger relatives over their drug use, she said.
But she doesn't like this idea. "If someone can give me a logical reason why drug testing will reduce crime, I can live with that answer. I still haven't heard one," she told us.
Others, though, welcome the proposal as a way to weed out drug-abusing neighbors who bring down the quality of life in a community.
We think the CHA should try this for a year. Let's see if it meets three tests: Is it cost-effective, does it make public housing safer and does it improve the quality of life in communities where CHA has a presence.
If it does not meet those three standards, the CHA should scrap it after a year.
The agency's proposal still is not fully formed. Officials could not say how much the testing and treatment would cost. The CHA needs to fill in those blanks while it takes public comments, through June 16.
The agency will learn from experience if drug users are deterred by the threat of eviction or if they can easily evade detection from a scheduled test. In CHA's current, limited testing, only 1 of 51 residents who tested positive was evicted. Others submitted to treatment.
Public housing is at a crossroads. The ongoing transformation is giving people a better chance to live in developments that are not overwhelmed by gang rivalries and drug dealers, as the high-rises often were.
CHA officials do not want to fritter away this opportunity to build vibrant communities, so they have come up with this unconventional idea. CEO Lewis Jordan says the agency is undertaking this initiative not as a punitive hammer but to promote healthy citizens and healthy communities. The treatment component is key; it gives residents a chance to get off drugs. That is good for them and for their neighbors.
"For the sake of peace and tranquility, they want us to do something," Jordan told us.
Let's give it a try.
________________________________________
Editorial: Silent majority back drug testing by CHA
Accessed from the Chicago Sun Times on November 28th, 2011
Editorials
Last Modified: Jul 7, 2011 01:58PM
The Chicago Housing Authority has floated the idea of making drug testing a condition of occupancy for all adults living in public housing.
Drug testing to get in. Drug testing to stay in.
On this thorny issue, which raises the hackles of civil libertarians and public housing advocates, we are siding with what we believe is the silent majority of CHA residents.
We think they want drug testing.
Not to punish poor people for living in public housing. And not to stigmatize anyone, though we appreciate that is a real risk.
We’re tentatively backing drug testing because it can potentially make newly revamped CHA developments safer and set a tone that illegal activity is simply not tolerated.
Because God knows that wasn’t the case with the old public housing projects. Over the last decade, the CHA has torn down its projects, displaced thousands of residents and begun to rebuild. The last thing it wants is to recreate the high-rise ghettos it once had.
Mandatory drug testing could be one small part of a larger effort to make sure that doesn’t happen.
Top officials at the CHA tell us the drug-testing idea grew out of conversations with residents yearning for a safer environment. Most public housing families, it goes without saying, can’t afford to live elsewhere. They can’t move if their next-door neighbor is abusing drugs. Instead, they want the CHA to do everything it can to prevent that from happening.
CHA chief Lewis Jordan insists this isn’t about finding new ways to throw tenants out. Already, the CHA does drug tests at a handful of mixed-income communities and, over the last decade, there has been just one eviction — a market-rate tenant, not a CHA renter. Some CHA adults tested positive, but the CHA offered them drug treatment and no one was evicted, the CHA says.
That is encouraging, though it doesn’t necessarily reflect what might happen if the CHA started testing tens of thousands of adults at all its developments.
Before the CHA moves forward with this proposal — which apparently would make it the first large public housing authority in the country to require drug testing — many issues still must be resolved:
† Safety: Is there any research to prove that drug testing will make developments safer or are other strategies more effective?
† Costs: How much would drug testing cost? Would those costs be worth the benefits?
† Treatment before eviction: Any new policy must spell out that residents who test positive would be offered treatment as a first step before any talk of eviction.
† The leftovers: The drug-testing rule would inevitably prompt some residents to leave public housing, with many using subsidized vouchers to rent elsewhere. How will CHA make sure parts of the South Side and West Side that already house a disproportionate share of former CHA residents are not further overrun?
In addition to drug testing, the CHA also wants to eliminate the “innocent tenant defense” in eviction cases. This allows residents facing eviction because a family member or guest is arrested for a drug or violent offense to avoid eviction by arguing in court that they were unaware of the illegal activity. The CHA says residents can still try to persuade the CHA before going to court, thus potentially avoiding conviction. But the CHA says eliminating the defense in court could speed up an eviction where it’s warranted. We’re not convinced. The CHA should continue to give poor residents facing eviction every legal remedy available.
The CHA is wisely taking it slow with both proposals. There is a 30-day public comment period, with a possible vote in July.
Chicago Housing Authority passes annual budget
By Natalie Moore | Dec. 21, 2010—Accessed from WBEZ website November 28th, 2011-
The Chicago Housing Authority board of commissioners passed a $917 million budget on Tuesday as the agency continues to revamp its properties.
In its 12th year, the Plan for Transformation has created mixed-income developments and rehabbed existing family apartments. CHA officials say 85 percent of the Plan will be completed under this 2011 budget.
“The overall budget is generally stable,” said CHA Chief Financial Officer Elias Rosario. The budget is slightly lower than last year because federal stimulus dollars will be used up. Most of CHA’s overall budget comes from federal funds.
The agency has set out to deliver 25,000 units by 2015. It will expand its portfolio by buying acquiring 60 foreclosed properties with three or more bedrooms.
“We’re going out and finding foreclosed properties throughout the city and we’re trying to bring those back to handle some of the needs of larger families,” Rosario said.
In addition, CHA will make 646 rentals via vouchers available through assistance programs.
And this source:
http://www.aclu-il.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ACLU-IL-comment-re-proposed-FY11-ACOP-6-3-11.pdf
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Apostrophe Practice and English Geek Humor
Then, this is a super challenging Apostrophe Quiz. Please try it and see how you do!
Thursday, December 2, 2010
Today's Woolf Analysys Notes
Now here's today's notes
AP Language—December 2nd
Bellringer—Please respond on your own paper in several sentences. Include a proper heading.
Why is the Virginia Woolf essay giving you trouble? What, to you, does “Analysis” mean?
Here are some anonymous examples of what not to do:
What’s wrong here??
Through out the speech Woolf speaks of a metaphorical Angel, which illustrates her inner thoughts. She says “the shadow of her wings fell on my page” – which means the angel impaired her ability to write. The angel symbolizes what a woman should be: pure sympathetic, and mindless. These are not good qualities for a critical writer to possess.
How about here??
Woolf’s tone in the “Professions for Women” speech was both humorous and serious. Her humorous tone is demonstrated when she says “all I have to do with my money is buy persian cats .” Then Woolf becomes serious when the Angel in the house whispers in her ear “flatter, deceive, use all the arts of your sex”—essentially lie. Woolf becomes even more serious when she tells us she “caught her by the throat” and killed her. By beginning with a light and humorous tone and transitioning to a serious tone Woolf emphasizes the poignancy of her Angel and its necessary murder.
Outline (AGAIN)
Intro-1 paragraph only
Body paragraphs—each relating to your intro
Conclusion- repeats ideas throughout
Writing Out loud.
How to construct a literary analysis paragraph… (Yes, write this down)
• Start with a topic sentence
• Keep everything in the paragraph relevant to the topic sentence
• Integrate your Quotes
• Every paragraph should be unique
• Paragraphs should build on one another
Do Not
• Flatter
• Blabber
• “Plop” quotes
AND, another thing
• Do not use MY writing verbatim-I’m giving you examples to help you create your writing. You are mistaken if you think I will accept this as “your work”—other than the fill-in-the-blank thesis your writing should be your own
Let’s Practice Together
Topic Sentence.
In “Professions for Women” Woolf depicts a metaphorical “angel” who early in her career threatened her ability to succeed as a writer.
Elaborate—Integrate quotes if you can
The Angel “whispers in her ear” and coaxes her to “flatter, deceive,” in essence lie when she attempts to review a novel written by a man.
Continue to elaborate—try to answer the questions how and why.
Woolf realizes she cannot become a successful writer without killing the angel. She claims to have murdered her out of self-defense—“If I hadn’t have killed her she would have ripped the heart out of my writing.” Woolf uses a sardonic tone to capture her young, admiring audience when she describes grabbing her “by the throat” and killing off the angel.
Start a new paragraph that connects to the previous one
The angel Woolf refers to is for her purposes in this speech an embodiment of the definition of femininity at the dawn of the 20th century. The angel “was intesnesly sympathetic. . . charming. . . unselfish. . . above all she was pure.” The angel was in fact an allusion to a poem by Coventry Patmore her audience would have been familiar with.
Here are some anonymous examples of what not to do:
What’s wrong here??
Through out the speech Woolf speaks of an Angel, which resembled her inner thoughts. The angel was used as a metaphor in her speech. Quoting “the shadow of her wings fell on my page.” The angel was to symbolize what a woman should be. Also, that the angel was to be purity and gracefulness.
How about here??
Woolf’s tone in the “Professions for Womemn” speech was all different tones. There were two of which humorous and serious. Her tone of humorous “all I have to do with my money is buy persiam cats.” Then Woolf turns around and becomes serious when the Angel in the house tried to whisper in her ear. The tone of the speech set the speech off in a whole different way.
Your Task.
Working with a partner or alone try to create one solid analysis paragraph, or edit one of your paragraphs based on this lesson.
Friday, January 15, 2010
Finals preview
Here's the link to AP central, where you can read all the questions and sample essays with comments. Our final will be question 1 from the 2009 exam. Happy reading!
Friday, December 18, 2009
Research Link
Here's a better link to the CPS library databases
Once you've gone to the above link click on Student Resource Gold, put in our school name or school code and you're in business.
Happy researching!!!
Remember the blog is always here, even when school is out. This paper is due Tuesday January, 5th!! email me at emeckart@cps.edu if anything is unclear.
Monday, December 14, 2009
Research summary
Week 16 day 1
AP Language
Bellringer(1-2 sentence journal)
How do you decide what is real on the internet and what isn't?
Objectives: I will be able to use library databases to find academic articles; I will be able to find the main idea and extract useful quotes from complicated academic articles; I will be able to make an MLA works cited page.
Agenda
Bellringer
Objective and agenda review
What is an academic article?
How to read an academic article and keep notecards?
How do I cite an article in a works cited page?
How do I use the school library databases?
Assign Research Survey (due upon return from Christmas break)
Student research time
Exit ticket: One complete notecard.
Like this one:
Hip Hop is now: an evolving youth culture. Carl Taylor, and Virgil Taylor.
Reclaiming Children and Youth 15.4 (Wntr 2007): p210(4).
COPYRIGHT 2007 Reclaiming Children and Youth
Emerging from Rap music, Hip Hop has become a lifestyle to many modern youth around the world. Embodying both creativity and controversy, Hip Hop mirrors the values, violence, and hypocrisy of modern culture. The authors dispel some of the simplistic views that surround this evolving youth movement embraced by millions of young people who are struggling to find meaning in communities that too often lack hope and pathways to purpose.
**********
Recently during a focus group interaction, a young college woman was asked what Hip Hop was. This young neatly dressed, articulate student thought for a moment before responding in a way that was very matter of fact. "Hip Hop is now; it's in your face, and it's real and honest." When asked what separated herself and her peers from adult culture she pondered for a moment and then responded, "We're not all that different from older adults except that ya'll were punks and we're not." Punks! The adults in the discussion did not like being referred to as punks but managed to contain their composure in order to try to understand the meaning behind this young woman's words.
Hip Hop, the latest form of youthful expression by thousands of young people around the world, has evolved over the last twenty years. Once exclusively related to rap music, this form of expression has now become a lifestyle. The influence of Hip Hop can be seen in fashion, electronic design, auto design, movies, music, literary works, and hundreds of other mediums in every facet of modern society.
The idea that older adults are "punks" revolves around the belief that adult culture is hypocritical, that older adults did the same things that young people do now but were afraid to admit their indiscretions. Compounding the problem is the fact that indiscretions committed by adults, not only in the past but also including current sins, are routinely focused on in the news and in historic accounts of individuals' pasts. Hip Hop is a vast and varied collection of ideas and values that are continuously fueled by new truths as well as misinformation and lies, rhetoric, and ever changing ideology and concepts that are relayed in the varying forms of Hip Hop music.
Use the sample article to practice writing a citation
How to make a MLA Works Cited page: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/05/
This is the schools library databases--which can be accessed from any computer with internet:
http://www.accessmyschool.com/cps/home.php?id=cps1860
Research Summary
Your objective for this assignment is to find, read, evaluate, discuss and cite three sources on one issue. For each source you must write a detailed paragraph-long summary, integrating (weaving) quotes with paraphrase. Finally, you must compose a two paragraph interpretation of the issue based on your reading of the three sources. All your sources must be cited in a properly formatted Works Cited page.
Here are your topic choices:
Education and racial inequality: Is there a educational genocide taking place?
Sweatshop Labor: Are your shoes worth it?
Factory Farming: If we knew what our food went through would we eat it?
Hip-hop and gender
Hip-hop and violence
The moral implications of Stem Cell research
Conflict in post-colonial Africa
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
AP Updates
Visiting the blog just like I asked, that's why I like you guys. Here are some likes I've been talking about:
First of all here's a link to AP central--where you can find the penny question, along with student work. The Penny question is essay question one from the 2008 exam. Make sure to read the student work and scoring guide!
Also here's Grammar Girl's website for all you comma and clause needs.
Don't say I never gave you anything!
Monday, March 2, 2009
Professions for Women
Alright so you got this paper on Virginia Wolff to write and you're starting early, right?
Here's the prompt: You will write a 4-5 page analytical essay on Woolf's “Professions for Women” that will answer the following questions: Virginia Woolf is careful to acknowledge the unmeasured and immeasurable value of the labor women have traditionally done, yet she also projects a future in which women will have access to all kinds of careers. Does Woolf come down in favor of one or the other of these lifestyles? What does she take to be the pros and cons of each? Do you think her predictions have come to fruition? How does her philosophy apply to
today's gender landscape?
Also you need to look at sarcasm and irony.
Let's unpack the above question: What does she say in the essay and how does she say it? What obstacles exist for women who want to become doctors, or writers? How does she use sarcasm? (btw--to the right a pic of Woolf)
These are just a few questions you need to answer for yourself before writing a thesis. However, know that you thesis should not be a laundry list of the answers, rather it should be an arguable statement about what Woolf meant, and how she achieved that meaning. You can then proceed to prove your thesis with answers like the above.
Your thesis might sound like this "In the essay 'Professions for Women' Woolf used sarcasm, understatement and self-deprecating humor to convey her message: that women face both phantom and tangible obstacles to joining the ranks of men- and that we can not call it equality just because there is no law preventing women from running for office or practicing medicine."
Then your essay would follow through proving the above assertion using direct quotes, paraphrase and summary. Easy, right??
Comment here if you need specific help. Remember don't use your full name.
Thursday, January 29, 2009
bell hooks
Extra Credit: Write a 2 page anlysis of hook's argument. What is her rehtorical strategy and what is its effect on the reader?
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Society for the prevention of misused apostrophes
It's a blog dedicated to pictures of misused, and clearly abused apostrophes--check it out.